Skip to content

roadside screening breath tests (1715A/23)

Request

 

1.The number of roadside screening breath tests carried out by your Police Force in 2022, split by month.

2.The number of positive/refused tests, split by month

3.The percentage of tests that were positive/refused, split by month

Response

1.The number of roadside screening breath tests carried out by your Police Force in 2022, split by month.

Month Total number of screening tests
January 912
February 743
March 737
April 504
May 489
June 459
July 576
August 671
September 572
October 543
November 499
December 696
Grand Total 7,401

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.The number of positive/refused tests, split by month

Month Breath Tests Positive / Refused
January 195
February 177
March 172
April 126
May 138
June 112
July 139
August 138
September 124
October 126
November 115
December 123
Grand Total 1,685

 

3.The percentage of tests that were positive/refused, split by month

Month % Breath Tests Positive / Refused
January 21%
February 24%
March 23%
April 25%
May 28%
June 24%
July 24%
August 21%
September 22%
October 23%
November 23%
December 18%
Grand Total 23%

 

 

 

Please note that these data should be interpreted with caution. Comparing numbers of incidents/crimes can be misleading and does not necessarily indicate the likelihood of someone being a victim of crime. In addition, the number of incidents/crimes recorded in an area over a period of time can be influenced by a number of factors. Consequently, statistics on incidents/crimes for one period may not necessarily be a good indicator of future incidents in that area.

 

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from a number of data sources used by forces for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your request is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are considered when interpreting those data.

 

The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of relevance of data to your request, but you should be aware that the collation of figures for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be considered when those data are used.

If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as to not mislead members of the public or official bodies, or misrepresent the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.

 

Attachments

No attachments