Skip to content

Body Worn Video / Officer complaints ( 1139A/22)

Request

  1. What date were officer body worn cameras introduced. If an exact date is not available, please provide the month and year?
  2. Totals complaints regarding police officer behaviour, split by calendar month and year, up to one year prior to body worn cameras being introduced and two years after this.
  3. Total complaints, split by calendar month and year, up to one year prior to body worn camera’s being introduced and two years after this.

We clarified on 30th August 2022 and you responded on 31st August 2022 

Question 1

For clarification, this would be for the general rollout from 2018 if force wide please.

Therefore:

1) What date were officer body worn cameras introduced. If an exact date is not available, please provide the month and year? General rollout across the force once issued to all officers, if a phased/trial rollout.

Question 2

This is to capture complaints against police officer’s behaviour.

Therefore:

Total number of overall complaints in relation to Police Officer behaviour (breach of code of ethics or unacceptable officer conduct), split by calendar month and year Jan 2017 to Dec 2018 and Jan 2018 to Dec 2020

Question 3

This is to pick up all complaints, so all totals.

Therefore:

  1. Total number of overall Police complaints, split by calendar month and year, Jan 2017 to Dec 2018 and Jan 2018 to Dec 2020

Response

Please find enclosed our response.

 

1.What date were officer body worn cameras introduced. If an exact date is not available, please provide the month and year?

They were rolled out May 2018, this was the start of the roll out.

Under section 21 of the Act, we are not required to provide information in response to a request if it is already reasonably accessible to you. The information you requested is available on the following website.

Body Worn Video (1645A/21) – Freedom of Information – West Midlands Police (west-midlands.police.uk)

Q2: Totals complaints regarding police officer behaviour, split by calendar month and year, up to one year prior to body worn cameras being introduced and two years after this.

Complaints received about police officers one year prior to body-worn cameras being introduced.  As discussed previously, police officer behaviour could be included in any allegation, so I have provided detail of all allegations:   01.04.2017 – 30.04.2018.

 

Allegation Category                     Count
Breach Code A PACE 3
Breach Code B PACE 49
Breach Code C PACE 66
Breach Code E PACE 1
Corrupt practice 32
Discriminatory Behaviour 40
Improper disclosure of information 43
Incivility, impoliteness and intolerance 173
Irregularity in evidence/perjury 40
Lack of fairness and impartiality 100
Mishandling of property 81
Multiple or unspecified breaches of PACE 3
Oppressive conduct or harassment 113
Other 10
Other assault 144
Other irregularity in procedure 20
Other neglect or failure in duty 552
Other sexual conduct 1
Serious non-sexual assault 18
Sexual assault 3
Traffic irregularity 9
Unlawful/unnecessary arrest or detention 81
(blank)
Grand Total 1582

 

Complaints received about police officers two years after body-worn video cameras were introduced:  01.05.2018 – 30.04.2020.  You will see there are more allegation categories in this table, due to the new regulations being introduced in February 2020.  The new Regulations included a new complaint definition, as a result of this there has been a natural increase in complaints nationally being made by members of the public.

 

Allegation Category Count
Abuse of position for other purpose 4
Abuse of position for sexual purpose 1
Bail, identification and interview procedures 2
Breach Code A PACE 2
Breach Code B PACE 21
Breach Code C PACE 62
Corrupt practice 20
Decisions 42
Detention in police custody 14
Disability 5
Disclosure of information 14
Discreditable conduct 5
Discriminatory Behaviour 54
Evidential procedures 6
General level of service 32
Handling of information 4
Handling of or damage to property/premises 25
Impolite and intolerant actions 6
Impolite language/tone 70
Improper disclosure of information 32
Incivility, impoliteness and intolerance 204
Information 29
Irregularity in evidence/perjury 27
Lack of fairness and impartiality 143
Mishandling of property 79
Multiple or unspecified breaches of PACE 4
Obstruction of justice 7
Oppressive conduct or harassment 85
Organisational corruption 2
Other 20
Other assault 146
Other irregularity in procedure 16
Other neglect or failure in duty 544
Other policies and procedures 10
Other sexual conduct 5
Out of court disposals 1
Overbearing or harassing behaviours 20
Police action following contact 114
Power to arrest and detain 24
Race 13
Religion or belief 2
Searches of premises and seizure of property 23
Serious non-sexual assault 24
Sex 2
Sexual assault 7
Sexual harassment 1
Stops, and stop and search 12
Traffic irregularity 6
Unlawful/unnecessary arrest or detention 75
Unprofessional attitude and disrespect 28
Use of force 53
Use of police systems 5
Use of police vehicles 12
Grand Total 2164

 

  1. Total number of overall Police complaints, split by calendar month and year, Jan 2017 to Dec 2018 and Jan 2018 to Dec 2020 

In the year 2020 you will observe an increase in numbers, this is because of the implementation of the new recording standard and categories.

 

Year 2017/ Month Number of ALL Police complaints received
Jan 68
Feb 69
Mar 66
Apr 49
May 58
June 67
July 59
Aug 63
Sep 129
Oct 76
Nov 69
Dec 61

 

Year 2018/ Month Number of ALL Police complaints received
Jan 42
Feb 63
Mar 44
Apr 51
May 39
June 41
July 62
Aug 40
Sep 29
Oct 43
Nov 34
Dec 40

 

Year 2019/ Month Number of ALL Police complaints received
Jan 21
Feb 33
Mar 67
Apr 40
May 28
June 30
July 47
Aug 13
Sep 24
Oct 39
Nov 36
Dec 28

 

Year 2020/ Month Number of ALL Police complaints received
Jan 22
Feb 341
Mar 264
Apr 362
May 352
June 392
July 370
Aug 299
Sep 286
Oct 430
Nov 328
Dec 260

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from a number of data sources used by forces for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your request is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are considered when interpreting those data.

The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of relevance of data to your request, but you should be aware that the collation of figures for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be considered when those data are used.

If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as to not mislead members of the public or official bodies, or misrepresent the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.

 

Attachments

Include attachments here