Speeding Offences (12609/17)
I was hoping that you could help me with some information I am looking to gather in preparation for road safety week.
The information I require, which is being requested from all UK police forces, is around the number of speeding offences recorded in your area in the past 6 months (May-October 2017) and how this compares to the number of speeding offences recorded in your area in the same period last year (May-October 2016).
Additionally, I am also looking for information around the make and model of cars that have been caught in speeding offences. We are essentially looking to understand in your force’s region – we need a list of makes/models and the frequency of speeding offences. The data we need is the months from Jan-Jun 2017. I understand from other forces that model may not always be present, so in such occasion, make alone will do.
We can confirm that some relevant information is held by West Midlands Police. However, while the majority of the information is attached to this email I am afraid that I am not required by statute to release all of the information requested. Please find attached a redacted document. This letter serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) for the parts of the document that have not been released.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The Freedom of Information Act places two responsibilities on public authorities, the first of which is to confirm what information it holds and secondly to then disclose that information, unless exemptions apply.
In this case, this letter represents a Refusal Notice for the redacted parts of the attached document. The information is exempt by virtue of the following exemption:
Section 40(2) – Personal Information
These exemptions and explanatory notes are shown here:
Section 40(2) is an absolute and class based exemption if to release the information exists would breach the third party’s data protection rights. In this case to release this personal information would not constitute fair processing of the data and therefore would breach the first of the principles within the Data Protection Act 1998. As this exemption is class based I am not required to identify the harm in disclosure and in this instance I believe that the right to privacy outweighs any public interest in release. The vehicle type is a free text box and in the redacted instances the information entered would allow for the identification of the vehicle.