Officer BME (3005_16)

Request

Question 1

 

I would like you to use where appropriate  as at 09/03/2016

 

How many BME officers in each of the following ranks do you have within your force

 

Constable

Sgt

Inspector

Chief Inspector

Superintendent

Chief Superintendent

 

Detective Constable

Detective Sergeant

Detective Inspector

Detective Chief Inspector

Detective  Superintendent

Detective Chief Superintendent

 

Question 2

How many of the below officers do you have in your force in each of the following roles

 

How many of the above number of officers in each of the roles below are BME

 

Dog Handlers

Mounted Officers

Negotiators

Family Liaison Officers

Traffic Officers

Firearms Officers

Underwater Search Unit

Counter Terrorism

Serious crime departments ( By this I mean the department that will investigate serious offending eg murder)

Taser trained

Response

We can confirm that some relevant information is held by West Midlands Police. However, while the majority of the information is attached. I am afraid that I am not required by statute to release all of the information requested. Please find attached a redacted document. This letter serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) for the parts of the document that have not been released. You may also find the following website useful

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/police-use-of-firearms-statistics

 

 

REASONS FOR DECISION

 

The Freedom of Information Act places two responsibilities on public authorities, the first of which is to confirm what information it holds and secondly to then disclose that information, unless exemptions apply.

 

In this case, this letter represents a Refusal Notice for the redacted parts of the attached document. The information is exempt by virtue of the following exemption

 

 

Section 31 (1) (a) (Law enforcement)

 

This exemptions and explanatory notes are shown here:

 

http://www.west-midlands.police.uk/docs/advice-centre/foi/exemptions.pdf

 

In line with the above, I am required to complete a Prejudice Test/Public Interest Test (PIT) on disclosure.

 

 

Public Interest Test

 

Section 31 (1) (a) (Law enforcement)

 

Harm

 

West Midlands Police are responsible for enforcing the law, preventing and detecting crime and serving our communities and protecting them from harm.

 

To release details concerning the number of West Midlands Police firearms and counter terrorism officers currently in our force could potentially provide criminal elements with information that could be used to divert resources from a time critical incident requiring the deployment of armed resources. The current security threat to the UK from international terrorism is severe and as such the deployment of armed resources to respond to such a risk should not be compromised by the disclosure of key information.  This would compromise the force capability and place members of the public at risk of harm.  West Midlands Police has a duty to prevent crime, apprehend and prosecute offenders and carry out the administration of justice.  By disclosing the requested information, it would impact on the operations and tactical capabilities of West Midlands Police.

 

Factors Favouring Disclosure

 

West Midlands Police are accountable to the public for providing efficient resources, training and for budgeting for specialist units and departments, in order that the public can be assured that the force is fulfilling its responsibility to protect and serve our communities.  It is in the public interest to know that West Midlands Police have sufficient resources in place.

 

 

Factors Favouring Non-Disclosure

 

Disclosing the information requested, would disclose our force’s capabilities, which would compromise the law enforcement function of West Midlands Police and place members of the public at risk.  The disclosure of this information may lead to deliberate and malicious attacks to divert police resources in areas where ARV numbers are low, or may expose a weakness which could be taken advantage of by the criminal fraternity.  By revealing any tactical or operational information would prejudice law enforcement which would endanger the safety of both members of the public and officers concerned.

 

Release of this information would provide the criminal fraternity with valuable information that would assist them with their activities, allowing them the opportunity to alter their behaviour to avoid detection.

 

Balancing Test

 

When balancing the public interest, arguments need to be weighed against each other.  The most persuasive reason for disclosure which is accountability needs to be weighed against the most persuasive reason for non-disclosure, which in this case is that law enforcement capabilities could be compromised, therefore placing members of the public at risk.

 

West Midlands Police needs to be accountable for the spending of public money; however we must protect any information that would have a negative impact on any operation, or reveal our tactical capabilities.  Public safety and effective law enforcement is of paramount importance to West Midlands Police and we will not divulge any information if to do so would place the safety of an individual at risk or undermine the prevention or detection of crime, thereby assisting those persons intent on committing crime.

 

Therefore in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.

 

 

Attachments

0001_3005_ATTACHMENT_1

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed