Adults In Detention (312A/20)

Request

ORIGINAL REQUEST

For the year ending March 2019 please could you provide:

  1. Total number of adults held in detention
  2. Total number of adults charged and bailed to court
  3. Total number of adults charged and detained for court

For the three figures above please provide a breakdown by a) ethnicity, b) gender and c) whether the offence had a domestic abuse flag or not.

AMENDED REQUEST

I write to clarify one thing in my request – please provide self-defined ethnicity breakdown rather than officer-defined/ethnicity appearance.

Response

Please find attached our response.  I would also mention that although we aim to provide data where asked, by sending multiple / overlapping requests or making changes to your original request in a short period can place an administrative burden on the force to process, locate and retrieve the data.

 It is important to note that requests of the same /similar nature can be aggregated for cost purposes as well considering the burden.

 It may be worth considering all the information you require before submitting future FOI requests.

 The ICO provides guidance in relation to FOI requests, please see this below.

https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/official-information/

 

In addition to the attached response West Midlands Police can neither confirm nor deny that it holds any other information relevant to this request as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply by virtue of the following exemption:

Section 23(5) Information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters

Section 23 is a class based absolute exemption and there is no requirement to consider the public interest in this case.

Confirming or denying the existence of whether any other information is held would contravene the constrictions laid out within Section 23 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in that this stipulates a generic bar on disclosure of any information supplied by, or concerning, certain security bodies.

This exemption and explanatory notes are shown here:

https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/information-management/freedom-of-information/#freedom-of-information-exemptions

No inference can be taken from this refusal that any further information relevant to your request does or does not exist.

Please note that these data should be interpreted with caution. Comparing numbers of incidents/crimes can be misleading and does not necessarily indicate the likelihood of someone being a victim of crime. In addition, the number of incidents/crimes recorded in an area over a period of time can be influenced by a number of factors. Consequently statistics on incidents/crimes for one period may not necessarily be a good indicator of future incidents in that area.

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from a number of data sources used by forces for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your request is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when interpreting those data.

The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of relevance of data to your request, but you should be aware that the collation of figures for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be taken into account when those data are used.

If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as to not mislead members of the public or official bodies, or misrepresent the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.

Attachments

312A_ATTACHMENT_01

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed